top of page
Rechercher

Introduction

Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right and a cornerstone of democratic societies. In Northern Africa, however, this right faces significant challenges. In countries such as Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, and Mauritania, journalists, bloggers, and other media professionals often operate in hostile environments marked by legal restrictions, intimidation, and the threat of reprisals. Governments in the region have increasingly used both legislative and extralegal measures to suppress dissent, stifle independent journalism, and silence critical voices. The following report provides a detailed overview of the current situation regarding freedom of expression in these four countries, with a particular focus on the experiences of journalists and bloggers..

Across countries In Northern Africa, authorities routinely use broad and vaguely worded laws-such as those criminalizing “fake news,” “defamation,” or “undermining national security”-to prosecute journalists, human rights defenders, opposition figures, and ordinary citizens.

The media landscape in Northern Africa is often tightly controlled. State-owned or state-aligned media dominate the airwaves, while independent outlets face constant threats of closure, censorship, or financial blocks. Journalists and bloggers who attempt to report on sensitive issues-such as corruption, human rights abuses, or government mismanagement-are frequently subjected to harassment, intimidation, and even physical violence. Self-censorship is widespread, as many fear reprisals against themselves or their families.

Digital expression is also under increasing threat. Governments have expanded their surveillance capabilities and enacted cybercrime laws that criminalize online speech. Social media users can face arrest for posts deemed critical of the authorities, and internet shutdowns or restrictions are sometimes used during periods of political unrest.

Despite these challenges, Northern Africa is home to a vibrant civil society and courageous individuals who continue to advocate for greater freedoms. Human rights organizations, independent journalists, and youth activists persist in their efforts to promote transparency, hold authorities accountable, and defend the right to free expression. Regional mechanisms, such as the African Commission’s Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, provide important oversight and advocacy, but their recommendations are not always implemented at the national level.

All Northern African countries have ratified most the human rights instruments but when it it come to reality it does not exist .

 

 

Tunisia

 

Freedom of Expression: Since President Kais Saied’s 2021 power grab, Tunisia has seen a sharp decline in freedom of expression. Authorities use repressive laws, especially Decree-Law 54 on Cybercrime, to target journalists, bloggers, and critics.

Situation of Journalists and Bloggers: At least five journalists were jailed as of late 2024, a record high. Dozens of cases have been brought against media professionals for their work, with charges often related to “false news” or defamation. Notable cases include the imprisonment of journalists for social media posts and critical commentary.

Intimidation and Harassment: Journalists face frequent legal harassment, arbitrary detention, and police intimidation. The media regulator has been suspended, and journalists risk losing accreditation for critical reporting. Many resort to self-censorship due to fear of reprisals.

 

Algeria

 

Freedom of Expression: Algeria has failed to implement international recommendations on press freedom. Authorities frequently use fabricated terrorism-related charges to silence peaceful dissent, including journalists and bloggers.

Situation of Journalists and Bloggers: Journalists and activists face arbitrary arrests, prosecutions, and intimidation. The crackdown extends to peaceful assembly and association, with the government targeting those who criticize the state.

Intimidation and Harassment: Legal harassment, arbitrary detention, and threats are common. The environment has led to widespread self-censorship among media professionals.

 

Egypt

 

Freedom of Expression: Egypt remains one of the most repressive environments in North Africa for freedom of expression. The government systematically targets journalists, bloggers, and critics with arrests, prosecutions, and censorship.

Situation of Journalists and Bloggers: Journalists and bloggers are routinely detained, often without due process. Peaceful protesters and opposition voices are also targeted, with mass arrests before planned demonstrations.

Intimidation and Harassment: Intimidation includes violence, arbitrary detention, and legal reprisals. The threat of reprisals has created a climate of fear, stifling independent journalism and dissent.

 

 

 

Mauritania

 

Freedom of Expression: Freedom of expression is severely restricted. Laws on apostasy, blasphemy, and other offenses are used to limit speech and press freedom.

Situation of Journalists and Bloggers: Journalists are rarely victims of physical violence but face verbal attacks, social media harassment, and legal threats. Harassment campaigns and intimidation are frequent, especially against those reporting on sensitive topics.

Intimidation and Harassment: The authorities have been urgedto stop harassing journalists, but intimidation and threats persist. There is ongoing pressure on media professionals to avoid criticism of the government or religious issues.

 


السيد الرئيس المحترم، والسيدات والسادة، المفوضون الكرام، والزملاء المدافعون عن الحقوق،

أقف أمامكم ممثلاً للمركز الأفريقي للديمقراطية ودراساتحقوق الإنسان، مدفوعاً بالواقع العاجل والمدمر الذي يواجهالملايين في جميع أنحاء القارة الأفريقية.

لقد أدت النزاعات المستمرة في السودان، وجنوب السودان، وجمهورية الكونغو الديمقراطية، والمناطق الشاسعة فيالساحل والصحراء، إلى دفع الملايين نحو معاناة لا يمكنتصورها لا تتجلى فقط في الانتهاكات الواسعة النطاق لحقوقالإنسان، بل أيضاً في التفكك الاجتماعي والاقتصاديالعميق وانقسام المجتمعات. 

انتهاكات حقوق الإنسان في:

مناطق النزاع في السودان وجنوب السودان: 

تميزت عقود من النزاع بانتهاكات جسيمة تشمل القتل خارجنطاق القانون، والنزوح القسري، والعنف الجنسي، وتجنيدالأطفال كمحاربين. وقد دمرت هذه الانتهاكات الأسروالمجتمعات، مما أدى إلى تآكل النسيج الاجتماعي وتركالناجين في مواجهة الصدمات وانعدام الأمن 

جمهورية الكونغو الديمقراطية:

الانتهاكات هناك فظيعةمجازر، الاغتصاب كأسلوب حرب، الاحتجاز التعسفي وهلم جرا...

حيث يعاني السكان المدنيون من أضرار جسدية هائلة وكذلكصدمات نفسية، تتفاقم بفعل الإفلات الواسع من العقابوضعف المؤسسات الحكومية في مناطق الساحل والصحراء،  والتي أسفرت النزاعات التي تشمل الجماعات المتطرفةوالجماعات المسلحة وتجنيد الاطفال، والعنف  الاثنى والعرقىبين المجتمعات المختلفة، وانعدام الأمن الحكومي عن أزمةإنسانية مفزعة وكذلك الهجمات على المدنيين، والاختفاءالقسري، والاختطافات شائعة، بينما أدى تهجير مجتمعاتبأكملها إلى توتر التماسك الاجتماعي والاستقرار الإقليمي.

 

 

 

 

 

 

الأثر المدمر لعمليات نقل الأسلحة:


تؤديعملياتنقلالأسلحةغيرالمشروعةوغيرالمسؤولةإلىتكثيفالمواجهاتالمسلحة،مماييسرارتكابجرائمالحربوالجرائمضدالإنسانية.وتؤديالأسلحةإلىتفاقممواطنالضعفوعرقلةالجهودالراميةإلىتحقيقالسلاموالمصالحة.ويتيحتوافرالأسلحةالمتطورةتنفيذانتهاكاتمثلالمذابحوالعنفالجنسيمعالإفلاتمنالعقابوعلىنطاقواسع.

في ظل هذه الأزمات المستمرة، يبقى موضوع العدالةوالتعويضات للضحايا مهملًا إلى حد كبير. ملايين الأشخاصتحملوا آثار النزاع ليس فقط الإصابات الجسدية ولكن أيضًاالصدمة النفسية العميقة، والحرمان الاقتصادي، والانهيارالاجتماعي حيث يعاني  الناجون من العنف الجنسي، والعائلات المشردة، والمجتمعات المتأثرة بالاختفاء القسري ويواجهون تهميشًا مستمرًا وغياب دعم حقيقي وتمثلالتعويضات لهؤلاء الضحايا طريقًا حاسمًا نحو العدالةالانتقالية والسلام المستدام. فهي ليست مجرد رمزية، بلضرورية لاستعادة حقوق وكرامة الضحايا وتمكين المجتمعاتمن التحرر من دوائر العنف والاستياء.

نحث اللجنة الأفريقية على دعم سياسات التعويضات التيتكون:

-  شاملة ومبنية على المجتمع: حيث يجب تصميم التعويضاتمن خلال استشارة حقيقية مع السكان المتضررين، بما فيذلك النساء والشباب والفئات المهمشة.

- متكاملة: يجب أن تشمل التعويضات التعويض المالي، وإعادة التأهيل، واستعادة الممتلكات أو الحقوق، وضمان عدمالتكرار من خلال الإصلاحات المؤسسية.

- مدعومة من الحكومة والشركاء: تتطلب التعويضات الفعالةالتزامًا سياسيًا وتعاونًا بين الحكومات والهيئات الإقليميةوالشركاء الدوليين.

- تعزيز حل النزاعات وحماية حقوق الإنسان: السلام هوالأساس الذي تعتمد عليه جميع حقوق الإنسان إذ يتطلبتحقيق السلام الدائم جهودًا نشطة، دقيقة، وطنية و محلية لحلالنزاعات تعالج الأسباب الجذرية وتعزز الشمولية.

 

وفي الاخير ندعو اللجنة الأفريقية والاتحاد الأفريقي إلى:

- دعم وتعزيز عمليات الوساطة والحوار التي يقودها الفاعلونالإقليميون والمحليون، مع تمكين النساء والشباب بشكلخاص، الذين غالبًا ما يُستبعدون من الحوارات الرسميةللسلام.

- الدعوة إلى إصلاحات في الحكم  والتي تعطي أولوية لحقوقالإنسان والعدالة الاجتماعية والديمقراطية التشاركية لمعالجةالمظالم التي تؤدي إلى النزاعات.

- تعزيز المبادرات المعنية بإعادة الإعمار بعد الصراع وفقإطار حقوق الإنسان، مع ضمان استفادة الفئات الضعيفةوالمهمشة من جهود إعادة البناء.

 

- إصدار إدانة قوية وصريحة لنقل الأسلحة الغير القانونيوالغير المسؤول الذي يفاقم العنف وانتهاكات حقوق الإنسانفي جميع أنحاء القارة.

- تعزيز التعاون مع الاتحاد الإفريقي والأمم المتحدة ومنظماتالمجتمع المدني لتعزيز حوكمة السيطرة على الأسلحة وآلياتالمراقبة والتنفيذ.

- حث الدول الأطراف على مراجعة وتعزيز أطرها القانونيةوقدراتها التنفيذية لتنظيم نقل الأسلحة بما يتوافق معالتزاماتها تجاه حقوق الإنسان.

- الدعوة إلى تصميم وتنفيذ سياسات شاملة للتعويضاتلضحايا النزاعات المسلحة تلبي احتياجاتهم المتعددة الأبعادوتعزز العدالة والشفاء.

- دعم تمكين وحماية المدافعين عن حقوق الإنسان ومنظماتالمجتمع المدني العاملة في المناطق المتضررة من النزاعات، وضمان سلامتهم، وصولهم، ومساحتهم التشغيلية.

وشكرا على حسن الانصات والتفهم....

Transnational organized crime remains a critical challenge in Africa, with traditional organized crime activities, such as human trafficking, drug smuggling, and arms trafficking, increasingly intersecting with the operations of non-state armed groups. These criminal networks exploit the region's vulnerabilities, exacerbating human rights violations and undermining development efforts.

 

In North Africa and the Sahel, the rise of non-state armed groups has created a volatile environment where traditional organized crime thrives. These groups often engage in trafficking in persons, exploiting marginalized populations and perpetuating cycles of violence and instability. The direct relationships forming between organized crime syndicates and terrorist organizations further complicate the landscape, as both parties seek to profit from illegal activities, including the illicit extraction of resources.

 

The impact of these crimes is profound. They not only violate individual rights but also erode the rule of law, hinder economic development, and compromise national security. Communities are left vulnerable, with victims of trafficking and other crimes often lacking access to justice or adequate support systems.

 

To combat these challenges effectively, it is essential to strengthen legal and legislative frameworks that address both organized crime and the human rights of affected individuals. Enhancing international and regional cooperation is vital, as these crimes transcend borders and require a unified response. Additionally, exploring comprehensive compensation mechanisms for victims is crucial to restore dignity and promote recovery.

 

The implications of organized crime are profound, impacting human rights directly and indirectly. It can be said that organized crime is one of the major threats to Africa’s ability to achieve development, uphold justice, and protect human rights. Therefore, it is imperative that we strengthen our security capacities, enhance legal and legislative frameworks, and foster international and regional collaboration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our approach must be informed by a collective vision for joint action structured around three key axes:

 

 Axe 1: Strengthening Legal Frameworks

 

To effectively combat transnational organized crime, we must focus on enhancing and harmonizing legal frameworks across nations. This involves several critical steps:

 

1. Harmonization of Laws:

• Countries need to align their legal definitions and penalties related to organized crime. This includes standardizing laws concerning human trafficking, drug smuggling, and arms trafficking to ensure consistency in enforcement and prosecution.

• By harmonizing laws, we can reduce jurisdictional challenges where criminals exploit differences in legal standards to evade justice.

 

2. Adoption of International Conventions:

• Encouraging countries to ratify and implement key international conventions, such as the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its Protocols, can provide a robust legal framework for addressing these issues.

• These conventions offer guidelines for effective legislation and promote cooperation among states in the fight against organized crime.

 

3. Establishing Specialized Courts:

• Countries may consider establishing specialized courts or tribunals dedicated to handling cases related to organized crime. These courts can expedite proceedings and ensure that judges are well-versed in the complexities of these cases.

• Specialized training for judicial staff can enhance their understanding of the legal nuances involved in transnational crime.

 

 

 

 

 

4. Strengthening Law Enforcement Powers:

• Legal reforms should empower law enforcement agencies with the necessary tools to investigate and prosecute organized crime effectively. This may include enhancing surveillance capabilities, enabling cross-border investigations, and facilitating asset recovery.

• Regulations should also allow for the sharing of intelligence and resources among countries to ensure a coordinated response.

 

 Axe 2: Enhancing Information Sharing

 

Effective information sharing is crucial for disrupting organized crime networks and enhancing law enforcement efforts. Here are key components to consider:

 

1. Regional Databases:

• Establishing comprehensive regional databases that track criminal activities, suspects, and trends can significantly enhance our collective intelligence. These databases should be accessible to law enforcement agencies across borders.

• By consolidating information, countries can identify patterns, share intelligence on emerging threats, and coordinate joint operations.

 

2. Secure Communication Channels:

• Developing secure communication platforms for law enforcement agencies to share sensitive information is essential. These platforms can facilitate real-time communication, allowing for timely responses to criminal activities.

• Training personnel on the use of these communication tools will ensure that information is shared efficiently and securely.

 

3. Joint Investigative Teams:

• Promoting the formation of joint investigative teams comprising officers from different countries can enhance cross-border cooperation. These teams can work collaboratively on specific cases, sharing resources and expertise.

• Joint operations allow for a unified approach to tackling organized crime and can lead to more effective outcomes.

 

 

4. Intelligence Sharing Agreements:

• Countries should establish formal agreements for intelligence sharing, outlining protocols for how information will be exchanged, the types of data to be shared, and the responsibilities of each party.

• This ensures that all involved parties are committed to a collaborative approach and facilitates smoother operations.

 

5. Capacity Building for Data Analysis:

• Investing in training programs focused on data analysis and intelligence assessment can empower law enforcement agencies to better utilize shared information. This includes training on how to interpret data trends, identify key players, and predict criminal behavior.

• Enhanced analytical capabilities will enable agencies to act proactively rather than reactively in the face of organized crime.

 

Axe 3: Joint Training and Capacity Building

 

We need to prioritize joint training initiatives that empower law enforcement agencies across borders. Workshops and training sessions on best practices will not only enhance skills but also foster partnerships and trust among nations. This collaborative approach will strengthen our collective capability to combat organized crime effectively.

 

Engaging civil society is also crucial. By involving NGOs and community organizations in awareness campaigns and victim support programs, we can create a more comprehensive approach to combatting organized crime.

 

Lastly, we must not overlook the importance of compensation mechanisms for victims. Developing regional and national frameworks to support those affected by these crimes is essential in restoring dignity and justice.

Copyright 2025  ©. Independent Commission for Human Rights in North Africa. All rights reserved.

bottom of page